UN agency helps North Korea with patent application for banned nerve gas chemical. EXCLUSIVE: For more than a year, a United Nations agency in Geneva has been helping North Korea prepare an international patent application for production of sodium cyanide - - a chemical used to make the nerve gas Tabun - - which has been on a list of materials banned from shipment to that country by the U. N. Security Council since 2. The World Intellectual Property Organization, or WIPO, has made no mention of the application to the Security Council committee monitoring North Korea sanctions, nor to the U. N. Panel of Experts that reports sanctions violations to the committee, even while concerns about North Korean weapons of mass destruction, and the willingness to use them, have been on a steep upward spiral. Fox News told both U. N. 1, 2. 01. 5 - - about two months before its fourth illegal nuclear test.
Includes a introduction to Roman numerals including a translation of the digits used and a converter which can convert decimal to Roman numerals and vice versa. WebMD's Eyes Anatomy Pages provide a detailed picture and definition of the human eyes. Learn about their function and problems that can affect the eyes. Nerve CastThe most recent document on the website is a “status report,” dated May 1. May 8), declaring the North Korean applicants’ fitness “to apply for and be granted a patent.”CLICK HERE FOR THE STATUS REPORTDuring all that time, however, the U. N.’s Panel of Experts on North Korea “has no record of any communication from WIPO to the Committee or the Panel regarding such a serious patent application. Representative to the U. N.,” William Newcomb, a member of the U. N. Panel of Experts for nearly three years ending in 2. Fox News. Said an expert familiar with the sanctions regime: “It undermines sanctions to have this going on. State Department about WIPO’s patent dealings with North Korea had not been answered before this story was published. For its part, a WIPO spokesperson told Fox News by email, in response to the question of whether it had reported the patent application to the U. N. Security Council sanction regimes.”The spokesperson added that “we communicate with the relevant U. N. Neither country could obtain the equipment on the open market, and much of it would have required special export licenses if shipped from the U. S. The report kicked off an uproar, but after a lengthy investigation, the U. N. Security Council resolution 1. CLICK HERE FOR THE LIST That resolution, voted after North Korea conducted its first nuclear test, ordained that member states “prevent the direct or indirect supply, sale or transfer” to the regime known as the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, or DPRK, of the listed items “which could contribute to DPRK’s nuclear- related, ballistic missile- related or other weapons of mass destruction- related programs.”It also declared that “all member states shall prevent any transfers to the DPRK by their nationals or from their territories, or from the DPRK by its nationals or from its territory, of technical training, advice, services or assistance related to the provision, manufacture, maintenance or use of the items” listed. Additionally, it demanded a freeze by U. N. Its role in handling these applications is to ensure that they conform to the procedural requirements” of the 1. Patent Cooperation Treaty, or PCT, “and to publish them in accordance with the provisions of the treaty.” North Korea is a PCT signatory. Translation: WIPO is merely a neutral, technical pass- through mechanism. As the spokesperson put it: “The decisions concerning whether or not to ultimately grant the patent are the sole purview of each jurisdiction where protection is being sought, in accordance with national law.”While that may be true, it is also true, according to the WIPO website, that the U. N. Gurry was WIPO’s No. A year later, after much byzantine maneuvering, a heavily redacted version of the report declared that “while there were indications that Mr. Gurry had a direct interest in the outcome of the DNA analysis, there is no evidence that he was involved in the taking of DNA samples.”But the same document also found that Gurry had bent the organization’s rules and steered a sensitive cyber- security contract to a business acquaintance, , something alleged by one of Gurry’s former top deputies, James Pooley. Under Gurry, WIPO also has been the only U. N. State Department, on the grounds that it failed to adopt “best practices” in ethics and whistle- blower standards - - a punishment first meted out by the pro- U. N. Obama administration in September 2. Among the whistle- blowers who say they were forced to leave WIPO during Gurry’s tenure for drawing attention to the agency’s previous computer shipments to North Korea is Miranda Brown, formerly Gurry’s senior strategic advisor. Brown has repeatedly asked for her reinstatement at the WIPO, and just as often has been turned down by Gurry’s office. George Russell is editor- at- large of Fox News and can be found on Twitter: @George. Russell or on Facebook.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2017
Categories |